The Mercury Class of 1952

With a revised chassis and all-new exterior styling for 1952, Mercury aimed to provide just the right mid-priced car for middle-class Americans.

 

 

The foundation of the 1952 Mercury was laid in 1949. That’s when Henry Ford II, Lincoln-Mercury chief Benson Ford, and top executives Ernest R. Breech and Lewis D. Crusoe decided to discontinue the combined Mercury and junior Lincoln platform scheduled for 1949-51 and adopt a different approach. The ’52 Mercury, they determined, would be based on the more modest Ford package but with Lincoln-esque styling. This would allow Mercury to offer the ideal mid-priced product for middle-class Americans, they reckoned.

 

So the new Merc used much the same chassis and running gear as the redesigned-for-’52 Ford, with a similar boxed ladder frame but on a three-inch longer wheelbase, 118 versus 115 inches. Same transmission choices, too: three-speed manual, manual with overdrive, or Ford’s new three-speed automatic introduced in ’51, except here the the transmission was branded as Merc-O-Matic rather than Fordomatic. Nearly 50 percent of Mercury buyers in ’52 opted for Merc-O-Matic, which added around 10 percent to the list ptice.

In the original plan, Ford and Mercury were to receive a new overhead-valve V8 in ’52, but it was pushed back two years due to supply and budget issues. The flathead V8 carried on, with the Mercury version boasting a quarter-inch longer stroke than Ford (3.19-in bore x 4.00-in stroke) to displace 255 cubic inches. With an improved carburetor and camshaft and a bump in compression ratio to 7.2:1 for ’52, the Merc was now rated at 125 hp at 3,700 rpm. This would be the ultimate displacement and state of tune for the original flathead V8, introduced in 1932 and now nearing the end.

 

With the basic Ford body shell already established, Lincoln-Mercury styling chief Bill Schmidt and crew gave the Mercury tall, vertical tail lamps and an integrated front bumper and grille similar to the ’52 Lincoln. Reportedly, the Mercury’s simulated hood scoop was a flourish for the overhead-valve V8 that failed to arrive. At 202.2 inches overall, the ’52 Mercury was actually four inches shorter than the ’51 Mercury, but five inches longer than the ’52 Ford and a foot shorter than the ’52 Lincoln. Ford, Mercury, and Lincoln exterior designs were all of a similar theme in this generation.

 

A two-door pillarless hardtop, Mercury’s first and sharing the Ford greenhouse, was offered in both the Custom and Monterey trim levels, while the convertible was available only as a deluxe Monterey. Mercury also shared Ford’s new all-steel station wagon body for ’52 (below), which at Mercury was available only as a four-door but in both six-passenger and eight-passenger configurations. While the hardtop sold in respectable numbers, the four-door post sedan remained the volume leader in both Custom and Monterey trim.

Volume fell dramatically at Mercury between ’51 and ”52, from around 310,000 to 172,000 cars, for reasons mainly out of the division’s control. A 48-day labor strike by steel workers, national price and wage controls, and supply restrictions due to the Korean war staggered the entire auto industry. Production at Chevrolet and Ford fell 33 percent. But meanwhile, Mercury slipped from sixth to eighth in the sales rankings, falling behind Dodge and Oldsmobile, and it would continue to languish in seventh or eighth through much of the decade.

 

4 thoughts on “The Mercury Class of 1952

  1. Did that front of the engine exhaust system crossover, so close to the radiator, give any over-heating issues? What would happen if it was removed and block off plates installed at the front of each exhaust manifold?

  2. I thought these were great looking cars, but there weren’t many left around when I was a boy.

  3. The story is told that GM officials thought the 1952 Ford, Mercury and Lincoln were all built on the same platform, and attempted to put the Lincoln door on a Ford. It didn’t work…

Comments are closed.