Phantom Mopar Muscle: Chrysler’s Ball-Stud Hemi V8

The Ball-Stud V8 was intended to be Act II in Chrysler’s Hemi muscle-car story, but unfortunately, it never made it past the prototype phase. Here’s the story behind the interesting experiment.

 

 

Chrysler’s 426 Hemi was the king of the hill all through the ’60s muscle-car era, ruling the drag stips and drive-ins and more than holding its own on the NASCAR ovals. Still, the mighty Hemi was not without its drawbacks. With its twin rocker shafts and complex cylinder head castings, it was bulky, heavy, costly to manufacture, and expensive in the showrooms. The 426 Hemi was practically an exotic by mass-market standards, and no more than 11,000 complete engines were produced between 1964 and 1971.

As the 1960s were drawing to a close, Chrysler engineers went back to the drawing boards to craft a simpler, cheaper version of the Hemi. And while they were at it, they proposed to consolidate all the company’s big-block V8s—the 383/400, the 440, and the 426 Hemi—into a single, all-purpose engine family. Two displacements were initially planned, 400 and 444 cubic inches, and the project was given the official designation A279.

 

Of the handful of prototype engines constructed in 1968-69, only a single example is known to survive, Mopar experts say. This rare bear was owned by California drag racer Dick Landy for many years and eventually acquired and rebuilt by Mopar restoration expert John Arruzza. The block casting bears a 1969 date code.

As the photo suggests, the Ball-Stud Hemi is essentially the familiar big-block Chrysler V8, now sporting updated cylinder heads with canted, inclined valves operated by ball-mounted rocker arms. With a layout similar to the big-block Chevy or Cleveland Ford, it was significantly cheaper and lighter than the Hemi’s twin rocker-shaft system. The Ball-Stud Mopar checked in at 6.5 inches narrower and more than 100 lbs lighter than the 426. Photo above courtesy of John Arruzza via Pinterest.

 

With the 2.25-in. intake valves tipped 15 degrees and the 1.94-inch exhaust valves at 6 degrees from cylinder centerline, the A279 featured a tighter, shallower combustion chamber than the 426, but maintaining the familiar Hemi shape. Meanwhile, the twisted-from-perpendicular valve layout, rotated from around 12 o’clock to 2 o’clock, created what Chrysler engineers termed a “positive swirl” chamber.

Stamped, bathtub-style rocker arms, interchangeable on intake and exhaust, ran at an effective 1.6:1 motion ratio. Ports were sequenced IEIEIEIE, and while the D-shaped exhaust passages of the Ball-Stud head were considered inferior to the 426, the big, rectangular intake ports were said to flow better than older brother’s. Photo above courtesy of John Arruzza via Pinterest.

Chrysler originally planned to introduce the Ball-Stud V8 in 1972, but that never came to pass as the market for muscle cars and big-block applications in general was rapidly drying up. The project was shelved. Only this single prototype from the A279 program remains, which Mopar guru John Arruzza updated with a 481 CID stroker crank, a Holley four-barrel carb, and a sporty hydraulic cam grind, producing a healthy 500+ hp on the dyno.

The rare piece was then installed in a low-mileage ’69 notchback Barracuda formerly owned by Chrysler engineering boss Tom Hoover. A subsequent owner, Bob Solberg, donated the one-of-one Mopar car/engine combo to the National Auto and Truck Museum of the United States in Auburn, Indiana (NATMUS), where you can see it today.

10 thoughts on “Phantom Mopar Muscle: Chrysler’s Ball-Stud Hemi V8

  1. More than one exist…a few years ago,one was for sale on ebay. Also have seen
    pictures of one in a Model T hot rod built by an ex(?) Chrysler employee,but
    don’t know if it ever got finished.

  2. Great trivia, I had no idea. Chrysler ended up using big blocks longer than they planned. This could have saved them some money.

  3. A pity, 100lbs lighter and physically smaller made the engine far more suitable for medium size cars. But man made energy b/s got in the way. Where a 2 litre engine was as thirsty as a 5 litre!
    And in hindsight alloy heads would have made the engine even lighter. By 70 the technology was certainly available.
    The 426 was known as the elephant, maybe a baby elephant!

  4. I ran one of the engines on the Performance Dynos’s at the Chrysler Engineering Center in Highland Park, Michigan. There were to be 2 versions………400″ and 444″. They had one engine installed in a 71 GTX also.

  5. Ball stud Hemi’s and Ram Air 5 Pontiacs. The 70’s could have been AWESOME instead of awful.

  6. Either Hot Rod or Car craft did an article on it, back in the ’90s I think. I was just talking about this engine with a diehard Mopar buddy of mine and he never heard of it. There were many experimental engines that flew under the radar back then, including Hemi, SOHC and DOHC Chevy engines and an aluminum Cadillac V8. I’m sure I’m missing a few. But fuel prices, emissions and a shrinking market spelled death for Muscle Cars.

  7. If this is the only one, ?? why would this dude punch it out and put a stroker in it,cam it out ? What is the rarity of it when its like this ? Just to put it on a dyno and go oh boy goo goo ga. Should maybe cleaned it up and put under glass, like in the Big Daddy Don G’s museum. Not a rant, just a thought, Paisano.

Comments are closed.