What Made the Hudson Hornet Engine So Great?

In the early years of NASCAR, Hudson dominated the field with a lowly flathead six. Here’s our take on why such an unlikely engine worked so well.

 

Even the most casual NASCAR fan knows the story of the fabulous Hudson Hornets that dominated the early years of the sport. While there’s no question that the Hornet was a total package, it couldn’t have been a consistent winner without a competitive engine. And for fans of the modern era, that poses a question: How could a seemingly backward L-head six stand its own against the new and powerful overhead-valve V8s coming from Detroit, especially Oldsmobile?

First: While the L-head Hornet wasn’t quite state of the art, it was still a high-quality engine. Though Hudson, one of the smaller automakers, lacked the technical resources of, say, General Motors or Chrysler, the company had a proud engineering tradition with a culture of “when in doubt, build it stout,” with high-chromium iron alloy castings and other robust features. In the rugged environment of NASCAR’s pioneer days, overengineering was a plus.

 

Next, the Hornet was unusually big for an American L-head six. At 308 cubic inches, it was even a tiny bit larger in displacement than the 303 CID Olds Rocket V8—its chief NASCAR rival. The Hornet was part of an engine series informally known as the Wide Block family, also produced in more conventional 232 and 262 cubic-inch versions. With a 3.8125-in bore and a mighty 4.500-in stroke, the 308 Hornet (aka 7A) was the biggest of the lot. And in racing, they say there’s no replacement for displacement. In normal tune with a single two-barrel carburetor for its 1951 introduction, the Hornet produced an easy 145 hp at 4,000 rpm and 257 lb-ft of torque at just 1,600 rpm. The 1951 Olds Rocket was rated at 135 hp, so even in base form the Hornet was in the game.

 

Where Hudson really stepped up was with the Twin-H package, a dual-carburetor system originally offered as a dealer kit in 1951, then as a regular production option in 1952. Here, the standard Carter WGD two-barrel carb was replaced with a pair of WA-1 single-barrels (and two giant air cleaners). This not only increased air and fuel flow, it significantly improved fuel/air distribution, a traditional shortcoming of inline sixes. Rated output was boosted to 160 hp at 4,000 rpm, though stated torque was unchanged.

By that time, Hudsons were tearing up the dirt tracks down South, and when the company learned of the Hornet’s unanticipated success—prompted by a vist to Detroit by leading Hudson racer Marshall Teague—executives saw an easy and inexpensive PR win. Working through its racing representative Vince Piggins (who later took a similar role at Chevrolet), Hudson threw in its support with heavy-duty axles, chassis and driveline parts, advertising dollars, and most importantly for our story, the Hornet 7X engine and components, sold straight over the counter by Hudson dealers.

The 7X is the stuff of NASCAR myth and legend, some of it sketchy. But it is documented that there were multiple camshafts developed, the raciest being the “040” grind with .390-in valve lift and 268 degrees of duration. It didn’t idle like a stocker, but it bore a factory part number. Valve diameters were increased to 2.00-in intake and 1.687-in exhaust, a split exhaust manifold was engineered, and the cylinder block was carefully massaged and blueprinted, substituting larger 1/2-inch head bolts.

 

Cylinder heads from the 232 and 262 engines supported compression ratios of up to 9.2:1—remarkable for an L-head combustion chamber. Compression ratio is a major factor in engine efficiency and output, and here the Hudson engineers managed to compete with their overhead-valve rivals. And that, for us, is one more key to the Hornet’s success. Although no official output figure was reported (wisely), estimates ranged from 220 to 270 hp.

While there was some pushback from series officials at times, all these pieces were factory-supplied and thus NASCAR legal for the most part. “Strictly stock,” as the series was billed at the time. But in reality, the Hornet 7X was in effect a race-prepped engine, with builders including Smokey Yunick applying their special touches. Hudson won 80 races between 1951 and 1955, including 27 of 34 events in 1952 and three straight season championships. Lessons learned in NASCAR were applied to Hudson’s regular production engines in 1954, marketed as “Instant Action,” and more of the upgrades were used in Hudson’s final Hornet sixes in ’55 and ’56.

Hudson won its last major NASCAR race on February 6, 1955 in a 100-miler at West Palm Beach, Florida. By then, the Hudson brand was fading fast at American Motors, and newer and better V8s were arriving in NASCAR, including Chevrolet. However, Hornet sixes remained competitive in open-wheel modifieds for several more years, and all through the ’60s, Hudsons were ringers in NHRA stock and six-cylinder class drag racing. NASCAR is a very different sport today, but it will always have the unlikey legacy of a dominating L-head six, the Fabulous Hudson Hornet.

 

10 thoughts on “What Made the Hudson Hornet Engine So Great?

    • Yes, I was impressed. Especially running long distances under max load with marginal fuel. I still hope to learn more about exactly how they did it.

  1. A favorite Smokey Yunick story about NASCAR Hornets is the legend of his reverse-rotation engine. The stepdown Hudson already had a low cg and the theory was to load the left side of the chassis under power to increase forward bite coming out of turns for the Daytona Beach race. Mr. Yunick ground a very special stock appearing camshaft, rewired the starter, flipped the water pump impeller, fan and the rear axle on its mounts to make it all work…

  2. Also, according to Humpy Wheeler, another feature of the Hudson six that made it a great racing engine was the fact that it “wouldn’t overheat”. And since he promoted races at the old Robinwood Speedway in my hometown of Gastonia, NC that ran a six cylinder “Junior Grand National” as their top division in the ’60s, where the Hudson dominated again, I imagine he’d know first-hand.

  3. Not to be the wet blanket, but Hudson enjoyed success because there was really nothing greater at the time. I seem to equate the 4 cylinder Offy success at Indy until the V8s came along. The Olds V8 was almost an instant success, and the hemi cooked it altogether for the poor Hudson, never really asked for any of that. It should be noted, Hudson had some of the best drivers, an accolade that can’t be overlooked. Those Hudson drivers went on to drive for Carl Kiekhaefer and his magnificent, but short lived Chrysler 300s. Also, the 6 never did well at the drag strip, that was dominated by the new V8s.

  4. At least Hudson went out with a bang. And just as it was to fade into the mist of history, Pixar made finding out Doc Hudson was a real car with a real racing record an even bigger Gen-Z car guy rite of passage than teaching yourself how to drive manual on the way home from buying the car with YouTube tutorials.

Comments are closed.